50% of patients died in this Chinese trial :reported (Jul 2018) in an American journal
There is not a single citation of this paper in a year and half. It ticked all the boxes – CRISPR/TCells/PD-1/Immunotherapy, its should have showed up in the radar.
It now has 20/21 fatalities (reported casually on WSJ: Dec 2018 & Pulitzer: Jul 2019).
Then why was it ignored – the rush to clinical trials in the US? And India.
Printed in the “Journal of Clinical Oncology (impact factor is a huge 26)” it noted:
- “Mar, 2017, and Jan, 2018, we enrolled 21 patients”
- “During the trial, 10 cancer progression related deaths occurred”
Yet, the paper concludes – “well tolerated with no unexpected safety concerns”.
Guess you need 100% fatalities for a clinical trial to be termed “unsafe” and “not well-tolerated”
“Hyperprogression % in PD-1 inhibition studies is bad (20% deaths)– adding CRISPR in that equation is lethal“. 100% is not acceptable.